Some nice Osprey color artwork

I got my copy of it in bloors bookshop on mansfield road in notts.

I spent about

If its passed 9 there is a 95% chance im pissed.

 

as said abebooks.co.uk or ebay, there will be someone who sells it cheaper than amazon

And there'd be no fun if people didn't disagree on here gadge my raspberry would be redundant can't have that can we .... SHUT UP THE LOT OF YOU

as said abebooks.co.uk or ebay, there will be someone who sells it cheaper than amazon

And there'd be no fun if people didn't disagree on here gadge my raspberry would be redundant can't have that can we .... SHUT UP THE LOT OF YOU

Cheers for the link just purchased it for

Oh agreed.

i love an argubate as you can tell...

however *this*

http://www.wwiireenacting.co.uk/forum/v ... hp?t=21327

FIFTEEN PAGES! on what colour blanco is right for WWII is a classic example of too much detial / arguing

I can't find it now there was one a week maybes two ago about whether to blanco or not IT WENT ON FOREVER ffs pmsl and I don't think they came to a conclusion I was non the wiser when I finished reading it than I was at the beginning Think the only thing that gets the women going is the great stocking debate and hair (guilty of complaining and if I ever see the group that do it oooooo I wouldn't dare they bigger than me )

Cheers for the link just purchased it for

 

Cheers for the link just purchased it for

If its passed 9 there is a 95% chance im pissed.

 

I saw one that went on for weeks about what should be in the pockets of your battledress.

its why i get annoyed when the term 'sttch counting ' is stupidly bandied about by folk who've not come across true obsessive detialers who will tel you that you're badges are on wrong os the whermacht uses diagonal machine stitch and s not a straight stitch.

HA you reminded me of the double stitching post had forgot about that one

Does anyone have any other scans from Osprey men-at-arms books?

Note of caution here - reproduction of copyright material ain't a good idea I'm afraid, and it's me that will be sued.

Just the odd small repro is OK when illustrating a point where the source is named in full and 'fair use' can be argued...

These were from mp.net, and I did mention the series as well as the producer. From the interior of the cover of one of the books which the sets were from, we are allowed "any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism, or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act, 1988". I think it's alright as the images have been used for the above purposes only...

I have already removed other large scale scans from this thread and wasn't directly refering to yours Neo, just stemming a potential flood of more scans!

However, as you state, 'fair use' can only be argued (in court!) in context of review, not 'here are some cool scans' published on a forum accessed by the rest of the world and not by any stretch of the imagination 'private use'. Still, there was an element of criticism!

Anyhoo, here endeth the heads-up - future gratuitus copyright breaches by any poster will be removed without a by-your-leave or apology.

Blummin' 'eck! I drive right past Osprey Publishing HQ every day and I didn't notice!!! They're to the west side of Oxford City. I hope they have a 'factory shop' or 'secretary sales'.